Optimizing School-Based Management to Improve Student Performance: a Review of the 2023 Curriculum
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61132/ijier.v1i4.68Keywords:
Student Performance, School-Based Management, 2023 Curriculum, Optimization, EducationAbstract
This study examines the optimization of school-based management (SBM) in improving student performance in the era of the 2023 curriculum. With the background of the importance of adapting to curriculum changes and the challenges faced in the education system, this research aims to identify effective SBM strategies and their impact on student performance. The methodology employed is qualitative research, utilizing data collection techniques such as interviews, questionnaires, observations, and document studies. The findings indicate that the implementation of SBM, which involves all stakeholders collaboratively, can significantly enhance student learning outcomes. Furthermore, this study provides recommendations for strengthening teacher training and increasing parental involvement in the educational process. The implications of this research emphasize the importance of sustaining SBM practices to create a responsive and adaptive learning environment and to achieve better educational goals in the future.
References
Bishop, J. (2016). The role of school-based management in improving student outcomes. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(4), 613-644. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X16661473
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Day, C., Gu, Q., & Sammons, P. (2016). The impact of school leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the international evidence. Educational Leadership and Management.
Fink, D., & Stoll, L. (2016). Professional learning in action: A guide for engaging in reflective practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X12455973
Finn, C. E. (2016). The importance of educational leadership for student achievement. Educational Leadership and Administration, 30, 24-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-016-9447-4
Fullan, M. (2016). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). New York: Teachers College Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-016-9447-4
Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. New York: Teachers College Press.
Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2017). Leading improvement in schools: A research perspective. Journal of Educational Administration, 55(5), 537-551. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-01-2017-0002
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2023). Kurikulum 2023: Pedoman umum dan implementasi.
Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2012). A review of transformational school leadership research 1996–2006. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X12455973
Merriam, S. B. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Permendikbud No. 22. (2023). Tentang standar proses pendidikan. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Sallis, E. (2014). Total quality management in education (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Wibowo, A. (2020). Manajemen berbasis sekolah: Teori dan praktik. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Islamic Educational Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
